The results of the Symplicity HTN-3 are finally out!

Simultaneously to the presentation of Deepak L. Bhatt (Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA) in the Late-Breaking Clinical Trials session, 63rd Scientific Sessions of the American College of Cardiology (ACC) 2014 in Washington D.C., the results are now published online in The New England Journal of Medicine. 

Symplicity HTN-3 is a prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial with a sham control, which includes high ambulatory blood pressure as an inclusion criterion. On January 9, 2014, Medtronic announced that the Symplicity HTN-3 trial did not meet the effectiveness endpoint after 6 months, but met the safety endpoint. 

Abstract 

A Controlled Trial of Renal Denervation for Resistant Hypertension 

BACKGROUND  
Prior unblinded studies have suggested that catheter-based renal-artery denervation reduces blood pressure in patients with resistant hypertension.

METHODS   
We designed a prospective, single-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial. Patients with severe resistant hypertension were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to undergo renal denervation or a sham procedure. Before randomization, patients were receiving a stable antihypertensive regimen involving maximally tolerated doses of at least three drugs, including a diuretic. The primary efficacy end point was the change in office systolic blood pressure at 6 months; a secondary efficacy end point was the change in mean 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure. The primary safety end point was a composite of death, end-stage renal disease, embolic events resulting in end-organ damage, renovascular complications, or hypertensive crisis at 1 month or new renal-artery stenosis of more than 70% at 6 months.

RESULTS  
A total of 535 patients underwent randomization. The mean (±SD) change in systolic blood pressure at 6 months was −14.13±23.93 mm Hg in the denervation group as compared with −11.74±25.94 mm Hg in the sham-procedure group (P<0.001 for both comparisons of the change from baseline), for a difference of −2.39 mm Hg (95% confidence interval [CI], −6.89 to 2.12; P=0.26 for superiority with a margin of 5 mm Hg). The change in 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure was −6.75±15.11 mm Hg in the denervation group and −4.79±17.25 mm Hg in the sham-procedure group, for a difference of −1.96 mm Hg (95% CI, −4.97 to 1.06; P=0.98 for superiority with a margin of 2 mm Hg). There were no significant differences in safety between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS  
This blinded trial did not show a significant reduction of systolic blood pressure in patients with resistant hypertension 6 months after renal-artery denervation as compared with a sham control. (Funded by Medtronic; SYMPLICITY HTN-3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01418261 .)

>>> Access the article

 

To leave a comment, please create your free account here !